I was born in the small town of Gorizia,
Italy, on 31 March, 1934. My father was an electrical engineer at the local telephone
company and my mother an elementary school teacher. At the end of the World War
II most of the province of Gorizia was overtaken by Yugoslavia and my family fled
to Venice first and then to Udine.
As a boy, I was deeply interested
in scientific ideas, electrical and mechanical, and I read almost everything I
could find on the subject. I was attracted more by the hardware and construction
aspects than by the scientific issues. At that time I could not decide if science
or technology were more relevant for me.
After completing High School,
I applied to the Faculty of Physics at the rather exclusive Scuola Normale in
Pisa. My previous education had been seriously affected by the disasters of the
war and the subsequent unrest. I badly failed the admission tests and my application
was turned down. I forgot about physics and I started engineering at the University
of Milan (Politecnico). To my great surprise and joy a few months later I was
offered the possibility of entering the Scuola Normale. One of the people who
had won the admission contest had resigned! I am recollecting this apparently
insignificant fact since it has determined and almost completely by accident my
career of physicist. I moved to Pisa, where I completed the University education
with a thesis on cosmic ray experiments. They have been very tough years, since
I had to greatly improve my education, which was very deficient in a number of
fundamental disciplines. At that time I also participated under my thesis advisor
Marcello Conversi to new instrumentation developments and to the realization of
the first pulsed gas particle detectors.
Soon after my degree, in
1958 I went to the United States to enlarge my experience and to familiarize myself
with particle accelerators. I spent about one and a half years at Columbia University.
Together with W. Baker, we measured at the Nevis Syncro-cyclotron the angular
asymmetry in the capture of polarized muons, demonstrating the presence of parity
violation in this fundamental process. This was his first of a long series of
experiments on Weak Interactions,which ever since has become my main field of
interest. Of course at that time it would have been quite unthinkable for me to
imagine to be one day amongst the people discovering the quanta of the weak field!
Around 1960 I moved back to Europe, attracted by the newly founded European
Organization for Nuclear Research, where for the first time the idea of a joint
European effort in a field of pure Science was to be tried in practice. The Syncro-cyclotron
at CERN had a performance significantly superior to the one of the machine in
Nevis and we succeeded in a number of very exciting experiments on the structure
of weak interactions, amongst which I would like to mention the discovery of the
beta decay process of the positive pion, p+
= p0 + e + v and the first observation of
the muon capture by free hydrogen, µ-+ p = n + v.
In the early sixties John Adams brought to operation the CERN Proton Syncrotron.
I moved to the larger machine where I continued to do some weak interaction experiments,
like for instance the determination of the parity violation in the beta decay
of the lambda hyperon.
During the summer of 1964 Fitch and Cronin
announced the discovery of CP violation. This has been for me a tremendously important
result and I abandoned all current work to start a long series of observations
on CP violation in K0 decay and on the KL-KS
mass difference. Unfortunately the subject did not turn out to be as prolific
as in the case of the previous discovery of parity violation and even today, some
thirty years afterwards we do not know much more about the origin of CP-violation
than right after the announcement of the discovery.
I returned again
to more orthodox weak interactions a few years later, when together with David
Cline and Alfred Mann we proposed a major neutrino experiment at the newly started
US laboratory of Fermilab. The operational problems associated with a limping
accelerator and a new laboratory made very difficult, albeit impossible for us
during the Summer of 1973 to settle definitively the question of the existence
of neutral currents in neutrino interactions, when competing with the much more
advanced instrumentation of Gargamelle at CERN. Instead, about one year later
we could cleanly observe the presence of all-muons events in neutrino interactions
and to confirm in this way one of the crucial predictions of the GIM mechanism,
hinting at the existence of charm, glamorously settled only few months later with
the observation of the Y/J particle.
In
the meantime and under the impulse of Vicky Weisskopf a new, fascinating adventure
had just started at CERN with a new type of colliding beams machine, the Intersecting
Storage Rings, in which counter-rotating beams of protons collide against each
other. This novel technique offered a much more efficient use of the accelerator
energy than the traditional method of collisions against a fixed target. From
the very first operation of this new type of accelerator, I have participated
to a long series of experiments. They have been crucial to perfect the detection
techniques with colliding beams of protons andantiprotons needed later on for
the discovery of the Intermediate Bosons.
By that time it was quite
clear that Unified Theories of the type SU(2) x U(1) had a very good chance of
predicting the existence and the masses of the triplet of intermediate vector
bosons. The problem of course was the one of finding a practical way of discovering
them. To achieve energies high enough to create the intermediate vector bosons
(roughly 100 times as heavy as the proton) together with David Cline and Peter
Mc Intyre we proposed in 1976 a radically new approach. Along the lines discussed
about ten years earlier by the Russian physicist Budker, we suggested to transform
an existing high energy accelerator in a colliding beam device in which a beam
of protons and of antiprotons, their antimatter twins, are counter-rotating and
colliding head-on. To this effect we had to develop a number of techniques for
creating antiprotons, confining them in a concentrated beam and colliding them
with an intense proton beam. These techniques were developed at CERN with the
help of many people and in particular of Guido Petrucci, Jacques Gareyte and Simon
van der Meer.
In view of the size and of the complexity of the detector,
physics experiments at the proton-antiproton collider have required rather unusual
techniques. Equally unusual has been the number and variety of different talents
needed to reach the goal of observing the W and Z particles. International cooperation
between many people from very different countries has been proven to be a very
successful way of achieving such goals.
Addendum 1991
For eighteen years, I have dedicated one semester per year to teaching at
Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., where I have been appointed professor
in 1970, spending the rest of my time mostly in Geneva, where I was conducting
various experiments, especially the UA-1 Collaboration at the proton-antiproton
collider until 1988.
On 17 December 1987, the Council of CERN decided
to appoint me Director-General of the Organization as from 1st January 1989, for
a mandate of five years.
My wife, Marisa, teaches Physics at High
School, and we have two children, a married daughter Laura, medical doctor, and
a son, André, student in high energy physics.
From Nobel Lectures, Physics 1981-1990, Editor-in-Charge Tore Frängsmyr, Editor Gösta Ekspång, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1993
This autobiography/biography was written at the time of the award and later published in the book series Les Prix Nobel/Nobel Lectures. The information is sometimes updated with an addendum submitted by the Laureate. To cite this document, always state the source as shown above.